I had some thoughts
concerning God etc. and i feel need to clarify myself.
Let's speak not about
GOD, what is only a term, but about if there is any intention to existence. I
feel much better with the idea that there is in our world a purpose than
without. I emphasized that i feel, rather feel than. While if you ask
what's the difference between feel and believe, i would say feelings are
personal and not transferable to others, while belief and faith are apparently
transferable.
Every human has to
decide for himself, if to believe or not and what he believes in (Kirkegar). So what do i believe in? I believe there is causality,
a cause and effect. I know it is just a faith and there is no prove that there
is causality on the metaphysical level in the objective world. Still the
human mind is built to think in these terms (Kant).
Science sais to us, that
on the very elementary level the events are happening randomly. Meaning
prediction of location of the most fundamental elementary level humans
succeeded to perceive until now, while measuring movement in space
and time, can be predicted not in absolute but only probabilistic terms.
Movement in space and time is the essence of all the being in scientific terms.
there is nothing without movement, no space no time, so the need to measure it
is fundamental.
Still the result of it
is, that those elements created chain connections to atoms, molecules and
chemical bonds in a way that life emerged. And finally consciousness
emerged, even as an emerging property of the complexity of the brain and
nervous system, and not a soul separate from the body, as some esoterics
wishfully tend to think. Still i feel, this whole system that eventually
brought the human spices to a level of consciousness, that you and i can
exchange these letters, gives me the feeling that there is certain intention.
From here we can start
to ask what is to be human. I would say, that this intentionality is about to
become a human in Nietzschian terms, meaning, to become an individual aware of
who he is, what he wants, etc., with capacity to implement his potentiality for
free will, which seems to exist, even if the trend i described above is by
definition a deterministic process.
But the existence of
free will also means we can't predict to where it brings us. One alternative is
evolving humanity towards God like technological capacity, (as described by
physicist Michio Kaku so nicely in his educative lectures,) and towards
individuality that every human will become a self aware educated being, who
will respect the others as beings with individual free will, without the need
to disrespect the society and other individuals.
The second alternative
is heading towards world, ruled by people believing in fairy tales, ancient
prophets, divine books, sacred rocks, sacred mountains, sacred rivers and water
streams, sacred land, sacred people, you name the rest. But also heading
towards despotic authority of dictators or any other rulers, preachers, legal
entities as corporations, banks, worldwide food chain operators, and also
presidents.
